slickness

The visual slickness gets in the way of actually using it.

The devices are also quite slick, but you have to concede that slickness alone is not what drives Apple's profits.

Plus I think they will really have to play catch-up to get to the level of slickness that Unity3D already provides.

No Android browser matches mobile Safari for the slickness of zooming into pages, but FF mobile just works fine.

>Apple killed specs because no one care about them and that hardware should be judged on its beauty and slickness and the UXAnd you know why this works?

And to have done it all in canvas is crazy impressive-- especially considering the slickness of the interface.

Now I'm primarily using IntelliJ, which has the best of both worlds in terms of refactoring power, ease of use and interface slickness.

Ubuntu advanced desktop Linux in terms of ease of installation, drivers and slickness bar a time when Debian seemed to be stagnating.

Having experience with winforms and Cocoa development, I have to vouch for the slickness of Cocoa MVC vs what usually happens with Winforms and event driven development.

To look at it from the other side, if omnigraffle was always available to you as a native app, as your app with your settings, with all of its slickness, would you want a web based alternative?

I'll agree that the present-day behavior of Apple has had few explicit negatives compared to the positives from the curation and the general slickness/ease of use of their products.

Funny to read someone defending Apple based on hardware specs when Apple lovers told us for years that Apple killed specs because no one care about them and that hardware should be judged on its beauty and slickness and the UX of its software which is where the Pixel does indeed shine.