shiite

E.g., when an angry Shiite captured a Sunni or an angry Kurd captured a Shiite, or an angry Sunni captured a Kurd, etc.

So 100 names written on a piece of paper prove that the Shiite militias were oppressing Sunni civilians?

Letting iran have the nuclear bomb will only push conflicts toward even more terrorism, especially between shiite and sunnites.

Beyond that, your mainstream Shiite / Shia Muslims are rather peaceful folk within the Western World.

A shiite ton of military equipment - Britain is a big arms exporter.

What the Shiite militias did in Tikrit[1] is an isolated incident?

While Iran and Shiite groups (such as in Syria/Lebanon) are mostly interested in local power grabs to keep spreading their Islamic Revolution outside of Iran.

When the majority of the Ummah is Sunni and a very large and important segment is Arab, that kind of goodwill is a little harder to buy for a Shiite theocracy dominated by ethnic Persians.

The majority of mainstream Shia / Shiite Muslims are actually peaceful.

I, however, refuse to support us getting involved in yet another Sunni vs Shiite fiasco.

Jihad has been fought by both Sunni and Shiite groups.

You're so blinded by bigotry I bet you can't even tell the difference from an extremist Wahhabist Muslim and my Shiite next-door neighbor.

And the Shiite yelling and screaming, "Death to America" from Iran is difficult to respect.

Iran also backed the Shiite "Mahdi army" during the Iraq war which fought a jihad against American/coalition forces, and today are still involved in a 'defensive jihad' against IS.

The South isn't decided by Sunnis vs Shiites because the South is overwhelmingly Shiite.

The Iraqi army is not Shiite, it is overwhelmingly Sunni and especially in places like Ramadi.

They now have a national government with representatives from Sunni, Shiite, and Kurdish groups.