seymour

The story is much more convoluted than Seymour Hersh believes.

And if anyone was wondering, Seymour Hersh is the journalist who wrote the killing bin laden story.

The question is not what you think about Seymour Hersh, the question is what you think about the motives of his supposed sources, and what that might indicate about their veracity.

> strawman Please, by all means, go talk to Seymour about his own words, which are apparently a figment of my spotty imagination.

Good article - I agree that Seymour Hersh is being treated unfairly by the corporate news media.

Does anyone else think this declassification is a response to Seymour Hersch's LRB article about how the official story about ObL's killing is false?

Why, Seymour has told us this must be true, and that's all we need to know.

I cannot help but wonder at the timing of this revelation, coming almost on the heels of Seymour Hersh's essay last week.

Fitting, since Seymour came to Earth in one of them.

If you have 4 hours to kill, this House hearing video clears many things (about how incompetent, but also how dismissive both Archuleta and Donna Seymour, the CIO, were - Seymour still not fired yet).

A couple of days ago news outlets were calling Seymour Hersh a conspiracy nut because his report contained information gained off anonymous sources in the intelligence community.

The first person who came to mind when I read the headline was Seymour Cray, who made the fastest computers in the world for quite a while.

Seymour said" Although TFA is not always the solution, there is no reason that every org should not institute this.

You realize the irony of linking to that article, with the following quote: > Then on December 22, 1974, The New York Times published a lengthy article by Seymour Hersh detailing operations engaged in by the CIA over the years that had been dubbed the "family jewels".

> Asked specifically what information the hackers had obtained, Seymour told lawmakers that she preferred to answer later in a “classified session.” Does anyone get the sense that often times "classified" is just a cover for "embarrassing?" Essentially information they know their political opponents have, but really wish to conceal from the American public?

Seymour Papet said that if you can fit concepts into your cognitive architecture then they are learned.

Seymour Hersh was instrumental in bringing the CIA spying revelations to the public view then.

Seymour Cray, the supercomputer architect, set up a new company, SRC Computers, and started the design of his own massively parallel machine.