self-identify

The ADA is intended to protect people who self-identify.

People are going to self-identify in ways you may not agree, so just focus on the content not the label.

But what if there are vile hate-filled people on the internet who do self-identify as SJW?

The same person who self-identify as pro-equality will fight tooth-over-nail to keep national laws that generate benefits for their gender.

But, of people who would self-identify as liberal how many are in fact closet authoritarians?

It only takes a little while for your body to self-identify with this new thing, and it becomes a sense quickly.

I do not self-identify as a Rails Programmer, so I can't speak for what they do and why.

Yes, it disproportionally affected Jews, but it also affected a lot of non-Jews (as well as people who did not self-identify as Jews).

Python's type system is weak whether they self-identify that way or not.

Edit: From the end of the article: This also means that we need to de-stigmatize homelessness, so students in need will self-identify and get the help they need.

By their mass, they change its meaning over time, then vilify anyone who doesn’t self-identify with the label—even those who believe in the original idea.

My guess is that people who want to live in the city will self-identify as urban much more often than those who want to live in suburbs.

Few HN users self-identify as "sexist." Yet reading this post, many of us will have done things that the author identifies as subtly sexist micro-aggressions.

Maybe you're right, maybe I'm just primed to think the author entitled because they self-identify as a "High net worth personal finance blogger".

I find that people who have a separation between their self-identify, and what they do for work are less likely to get defensive when their technical "correctness" is questioned.