scotty

> including scotty, actually, which is really cute You know people use Scotty in production right?

Pull a Scotty and estimate N*2 or counter with a simpler feature that you can do in N/2.

Spock is similar to Scotty but comes with a few more built-in features like type-safe routing, sessions, etc.

The core api service is written in Yesod and various other components are written in Scotty and WAI.

Kirk beat it by cheating, Scotty beat it legitimately, then proved that what he did only worked in the simulation.

The Scotty factor (development estimate * 3) will give you a more realistic idea of how long something will take.

Try using the Scotty inspired Spock[0] with Spock-auth[1] or consider using Snap[2] or Yesod[3].

I type with just two fingers like Scotty from Star Trek, but I debug better and write a better quality code.

Well, both web projects I did using the Scotty framework, which I adore.

I find Scotty and Snaps monad transformer stacks to be pretty simple.

It's not exactly Scotty and his Mac Plus.

So far I've seen: - Yesod - Snap - Happstack - Scotty - Spock Right now I'm learning Yesod, but I don't feel confident that's really what I want.

From the github Readme: "Since version 0.5.0.0 Spock is no longer built on top of scotty.

Have them give estimates, silently apply the "Scotty" factor, and base their performance against that.

It's annoying but as Scotty would say, "ye cannae change the laws o' physics"!

Material animations are not (entirely) pointless, they are designed to improve user's awareness of UI's behaviors - primarily by making transitions between related screens less "beam-me up, Scotty" Teleport-like.

Scotty is a library that gives you a toolkit for making webapps in a manner similar to Sinatra.

It is pretty clearly inspired by Scotty, but I can't seem to find a motivation or comparison anywhere.

It's intentionally tiny, so a bit trivial, but here's a URL shortener in Scotty.