roofs

The upside is the latter is just 0.05% of total USA land area, hopefully with most of that being used on already-erected roofs.

As for houses and car roofs - that amounts to almost zero in the big scheme of things.

And people without roofs have to pay for that, which is obviously going to be quite expensive.

And the reason they could hide those TV dishes under roofs is that they are not transmitting.

And tons of people have died as they fallen off of roofs as they installed solar panels.

Local council governments may have access to its road real estate, but have no legal right to install panels on roofs.

This plus the fact that 45+ states have already passed helmet exemptions for the Ello and other three-wheeled vehicles with non-removable roofs/windshields.

Finally, in cities, they could fly most of their way over the roofs of building, rendering a fall unlikely to hit anyone.

Yes, because clearly people in Kenya living in houses with mud floors and thatched roofs just need to work and save more.

With ten billion dollars we could have one million houses with solar roofs and powerwalls, a whole city unplugged.

Actually Uber would be a very sustainable way to constantly street-map a lot of cities if they just put cameras on the cars' roofs.

Metal roofs require so much less upkeep that they're a very good investment, saving a lot of time in avoided maintenance over many years.

Now it just serves to suck the county coffers dry due to ludicrously exorbitant maintenance costs (I mean, come on, "80 roofs?").

I predict a "fashion" trend in the poor architecture of the region to eschew better roofs even if you can afford one.