racing

The notion that a auto-racing is used to fund R&D is apparently lost on us.

Compromising and racing towards the bottom is just a coward's game.

If your claim to fame is you're the cheapest, you're going to be racing to the bottom.

If not it seems mostly like a recipe for frustrating to play a racing game where your controller has such a lag-time.

Well it's no big deal because the GTR is one league above in term of sport racing, this car is incredible on track, there is no way that Tesla will match that.

Of course there's a reasonable change of slippage at 25kmh on racing slicks.

I'm wondering if it would track fast enough to follow a quadcopter around an FPV racing course.

If we're discussion auto racing and Hyundai was giving out free cars, then would that mean that Hyundai was the best race car because everyone was using it?

Technology shouldn't go from foreign racing circuits, to Japanese and German family sedans, to American family sedans, and then finally to our race cars.

But we might see hybrid systems from racing more, that enables the car to become far more efficient in the city.

A car racing organization can decide that to judge the pilot skills is more important than judging the technology level, and therefore setup rules for that.

I use it for surfing, but just got a small racing dinghy (RS Aero) and will probably use it for that too.

The term "keep it to the track" which is often applied to the automotive racing scene is more than applicable here.

Another one is a hack called "Ayrton Senna Racing", modification of "Nigel Mansell F1 Challenge".

Racing up the stack doesn't imply you are dragging your ass up the same stack down below.

Racing the Beam absolutely changed how I think about pixels on a computer screen in a way that's hard to explain, but is quite profound.