punished

In this case, it isn't a question of how harsh the punishment is, but whether the people will be punished at all.

Legally, if the dentist is to be punished, that's where it ends.

The problem is that a lot of people want us to have laws saying that anyone who completely unknowingly facilitates copyright infringement should be punished.

The point is that this is still a bet and if the strategy doesn't hold up they will be punished much more quickly than a privately funded company.

Percentage of innocent punished, percentage of guilty freed, and cost are all factors for evaluating how well the system works.

Why is it so terrible to be punished for exercising your right to trial?

If you use your car to commit a crime, you should be punished.

Being punished for exercising your rights is the opposite of having those rights.

And officers who try to be ethical get punished by the others.

You are punished for daring to exercise your right to a trial.

Schaeuble at least talked publicly about it, and was punished for it.

In up to 25%, workers refusing to do overtime were punished.

But there is a valid question in the sense of "should a prosecutors role be to a) see the guilty punished, or b) to see the most convictions?".

By the time you've said "Why is it so terrible to be punished for exercising your right" I would hope the answer would already be apparent.

"If you use your computer to commit a crime, you should be punished."

Organized white violence against blacks continued into the 1920s—in 1921 a white mob leveled Tulsa’s “Black Wall Street,” and in 1923 another one razed the black town of Rosewood, Florida—and virtually no one was punished.