publishers

This allows us to give advertisers, publishers and adtech companies an overview of the entire online ad ecosystem.

If publishers were more ethical with their implementations of advertising technologies, fewer people would be driven to use ad-blocking.

The ad networks also allow choosing which publications to target, and higher quality publishers do cost more.

This would put user data back, and the control over ads back into the hands of the publishers and advertisers.

The reason people block ads is not because they don't want publishers to get paid.

That's why in the War on General Purpose Computing, publishers and advertisers are on the side of making the computing device not yours.

Seems to me that ad blocking, if it becomes widely adopted could push advertisers and publishers to work together to place ads in a more dedicated way with individual publishers, skipping the ad server networks altogether.

People want digital content for free, publishers continue to rape the idea of works entering the public domain in a reasonable amount of time.

In the past TV channels and publishers competed with one another.

We've focused on this for the past 18 months and have helped journalists and publishers get more than $1m in funding for quality journalism projects.

A better criticism to what e12e was trying to imply is perhaps that Rowling certainly wouldn't be rich if it weren't for a network of publishers.

Apple is trying to move publishers to its own garden.

At some point after this the publishers have both a legal and ethical case that you are not merely "experiencing the content as you wish", but actively defrauding them.

We help Publishers, Content Creators and Advertisers generate more online video revenue through sophisticated technology and a unique view of how our world is changing.

Publishers have done this to themselves with obstrusive intersitals; slow, over-the-content pop-ups; autoplaying video and audio ads; and other extremely annoying and degrading ad implementations.