progressivism

And progressivism is a morally bankrupt enterprise whose existent is justified to cure the problems it creates.

Very literally a white supremacist apologist, because every one of your HN comments is attacking progressivism.

We have willfully ignored reality per the ideological dictates of progressivism for the last fifty years.

If you don't like the result of decades of liberalism/progressivism's control, perhaps it's time to find a new governing philosophy.

So I give Moldbug credit for pointing out that progressivism is basically the same thing as a religion.

The author appears to suffer from nostalgia bias, longing for turn of the century progressivism to reign in his old corporate foe.

The 20th century, in contrast to past centuries, was an experiment in progressivism.

Learn to engage in feel-good progressivism without the dependency of industrial organization models.

Casey Liss went to bloody Virginia Tech, hardly Reed College level progressivism.

Libertarians would generally eschew both Eisenhower, big govt programs, AND progressivism.

The hubristic desire to control others is extreme progressivism's worst attribute.

Just like I believe in capitalism, but I am not a libertarian/Objectivist/anarcho-capitalist, and I tend towards progressivism and regulation as reasonable requirements.

Mainly because "progressivism" as the term is used today has little to do with what it was about in the past?

Let me quote George Will as an example: "To progressives, the best thing about railroads is that people riding them are not in automobiles, which are subversive of the deference on which progressivism depends.

This might sound good, especially to those who believe in "progress", but progressivism at its worst is terrifying (see, e.g., "Comrade Stalin—Leader of Progressive Mankind" [1]).

If he's so concerned about America exhibiting the signs of a Fascist dictatorship, perhaps he should take a long, difficult, critical look at the ideology that actually accomplished it: Progressivism.