plural

Keep in mind that Tor explicitly does not protect against: Exit nodes, as in plural.

Also, early on the authors fail to include an apostrophe that is needed to make the word 'individuals' a possessive plural.

Mass nouns and plural nouns don't necessarily need determiners, depending on how you're using them.

In Finnish the personal pronouns second-person singular (you) and plural (you) are not the same.

Repeat after me: The plural of Anecdote is not 'Data' Feminism only sees to female rights in reference to 'leveling the playing field'.

I would suggest a different approach: Prefer either the plural or singular form, depending on which your ORM prefers.

I don't care about what implications it has for plural marriage, I am talking strictly about SSM.

I'm to the right of president Obama, own guns (yes plural) and yet agree with him whole-heartedly.

Using the plural, your schema would be player -> team -> league.

I have no problems with polyamory or plural marriage, but our laws just haven't been designed to handle that case.

> Repeat after me: The plural of Anecdote is not 'Data' Right, 'Data' is the plural of 'Datum' and I provided you with two of them.

Use a collective name or, less ideally, a plural form.

OK, so clearly the idea that "code" is a mass noun rather than a plural is very unpopular.

This causes the water molecule to fall apart, creating free oxygen." The only electrons (plural) from one water molecule would be from the two hydrogen atoms, right?

Linguistic quibble: "Alumnae" is the nominative feminine plural of the noun "alumnus", and thus refers specifically to a female graduate of some institution of higher learning, &c.

Second-person singular is "sinä" and plural is "te".

Plural marriage has been normative in certain times and places, and still is here and there.