peasants

Rather than peasants dying in the fields while Comrade Stalin reports another glorious success of the five-year plan, the peasants can simply go and buy themselves food.

In Finland (and Sweden) the peasants formed one of the four estates and were represented in the parliament.

Is there ANY country in the world that is interested in allowing in millions of single, male Chinese peasants?

They used to own land (and peasants!) themselves or they were funded by someone who did (Church/King/Prince).

If you really want to go back to the age of peasants and serfs, why don't you lead by example?

As for food, most medieval European peasants considered themselves lucky if they got a bowl of thin gruel every day.

What's most pathetic is that the peasants take up arms for Uber to crush any resistance.

It is illegal for peasants, but communist elite can enjoy all luxuries they can effort.

In Swedish history, why did most of the peasants own land, and why did they ally with the king against the nobility?

There was no serfdom in which peasants were permanently attached to specific lands, and were ruled by the owners of that land.

The medieval peasants were slaves, too – legally they were owned by their landlord.

After the plagues in the middle ages resources were abundant for everybody, even peasants..

These are not "systematically enslaved and disenfranchised" peasants who were "property".

As far as I know, khmers rouges were "reactionary" marxists: for instance they refused western medicine and dubbed peasants as "old men" and city folks as "new men".

But there were still plenty of gentry left, and so a deal was struck: we (the peasants) get old age pensions and some trifling property ownership and a handful of other "benefits" and protections, and you get to retain the landed class privileges you've constructed and...