nutritional

Importing food or nutritional supplements into the EU is difficult because the EU still has a very protective agricultural policy.

Every piece of food has nutritional information at the back, with columns for 100 grams and one serving.

We should sit down and figure out a way to show nutritional information without these cheap tricks.

It's not a good full nutritional replacement, and it's caloric balance is for people who exercise daily and quite intensely.

Put another way: our dietary habits and nutritional systems developed over tens-to-hundreds of thousands of years.

It's like people think that they know some nutritional secret that soylent hasn't thought of.

Which explains why, in the early 90s, all endurance sports records dropped like a rock, because of a major nutritional breakthrough....

According to McDonald's own nutritional information [1], you'd consume 1,070 calories per medium meal.

For example, you have to show the nutritional information per unit of wrapping.

The labels on food packages and the calorie counting websites get their numbers from nutritional assays, rather than in vivo measurements in actual humans.

Drinking 4 16oz smoothies won't give you the same nutritional value.

Given that soy is one of the common allergens, this sounds amazing (especially with it being high-fat which matches modern nutritional science) except for the soy.

As a side note, the usual nutritional calorie (or "Calorie", with uppercase 'C'), is actually 1000 calories, or 4184 Joules.

Note that I have a primary mitochondrial defect, so my nutritional experiments results are always "weird", for the lack of a better word.

Because we have the "nutritional supplement" market as a working example of "We give people stuff without bothering to see if any of it actually works".

> Because we have the "nutritional supplement" market as a working example of "We give people stuff without bothering to see if any of it actually works".