nazre

There's a ton of he said she said, but to put it all on Nazre isn't fair.

But Pao opposed, sending e-mails to senior partners urging them to help Nazre rather than fire him.

Additionally Nazre has a history of sexually harassing female coworkers so at this point it's looking pretty cut and dry.

Here's how it looks to me: Ajit Nazre damaged Ellen Pao's reputation within the firm, after she broke off a sexual relationship.

The decision whether or not to fire Nazre was above Pao's pay grade.

Ajit Nazre does not have a PhD from Michigan Tech, only a Masters.

After Nazre destroyed Pao's reputation, she struggled to recover and could not.

Pao discontinued the relationship, then Nazre started cutting her out of work.

Pao and Nazre were dating and both married at the time.

If you're aware of the history of what transpired for the entire length of time that Pao and Nazre you already know she's a liar.

From what I read, Nazre was also a junior partner at Kleiner.

Based on Techcrunch's article, she was complaining about Nazre making her work more difficult by cutting her out of key work discussions and taking her out of e-mail threads.

The complaint/lawsuit from Pao is: "Nazre was harrassing me.

Otherwise you'd make successful advances legal and rejected advances illegal, which basically means "Lockup all the rejects in jail." Pao and Nazre ended up in a relationship so those advances were only part of the courting process.

And then: > Pao also said she was told by Kleiner Perkins talent partner Juliet de Baubigny that Nazre was a “sex addict.” To her, that pointed to a larger unspoken history.

"Pao and Nazre were both partners." This glosses over a significant problem.

What's in front of the jury is whether there was misconduct company and its employees in handling the situation post Pao-Nazre breakup.

After learning [from Pao] of Nazre's behavior, Doerr was angry with him and wanted to fire him.

But in fact, the leader of the firm was going to fire Nazre.