milton

LVT has maintained support among mainstream economists as recent as Milton Friedman, Joseph Stiglitz, Paul Krugman, and Tyler Cowen.

Thanks for Milton Keynes but that can't be the only result in the whole world.

I think it's the one thing standing in the way of him taking the baton from Milton Friedman.

This triumph, more than anything else, confirmed Milton Friedman’s status as a great economist’s economist, whatever one may think of his other roles.

Even Milton Freedman was a proponent of some guise.

Depending on job and other situations, I'm hoping to be out of London this time next year - probably somewhere like Milton Keynes.

Basically the same argument as Milton Friedman made.

As Milton Friedman argued in Capitalism and Freedom: > It is a striking historical fact that the development of capitalism has been accompanied by a major reduction in the extent to which particular religious, racial, or social groups have operated under special handicaps in respect of their economic activities; have, as the saying goes, been discriminated against.

He painted Milton Friedman as a radical in the top post's article ("radical free-market ideology", "Chicago School", "Milton Friedman's 'win'").

As Milton Friedman said, "It's just obvious you can't have free immigration and a welfare state".

Milton Friedman, who is worshipped by much of the right, advocated a "negative income tax", which is basically the same thing.

Free market principles at their finest!" - My made up quote for Milton Friedman, Jack Lew, and all the rest of those cronies.

Milton Friedman advocated for a negative effective tax rate for low income folks.

Milton Keynes clearly isn't the only possible result.