meanings

After all, they have context and actual loaded meanings, and in many cases represent hundreds of years of oppression.

Let people use them or avoid them as they will, and their meanings will shift, as they always have.

People tend to disagree on some things, along with the meanings!

Perhaps today the meanings are different (one is a superset).

There are archaic British legal meanings of the word treachery which might parallel your distinction of Landesverrat and Hochverrat, I am not sure.

It's as if we as humans have some kind of context-sensitive language recognition capability, and can tell when a word is being used as a slur or if it has entirely unrelated meanings.

I love aufheben and Zug, which both have roughly a billion meanings.

Clearly not, the underlying issue has nothing to do with the word but meanings that people attach to them and that is something that will not be fixed by outlawing the word as the meanings attached will shift to a new word.

The thing is, like most words in English, "socialism" has taken on multiple meanings.

Git may be a synonym (sort of) for "bastard", but not for all of its meanings.

The fact that words "have context and actual loaded meanings" is besides the point.

The "Rough Consensus and Maximal Interestingness" essay misquotes Knuth and incorrectly attaches philosophical meanings to technical terms like dynamic binding and lazy evaluation.

Meanings aren't found, because they aren't an aspect of the outside world but of our mental landscape.

Meanings are invented by human beings and then imposed upon the outside world.