mangoes

I tried: I have two mangoes, Jill has three mangoes.

The mangoes represented an end to much of the strife of the Cultural Revolution, and were understood as such.

I also think the point about the mangoes is missed.

The name also doesn't help, as they have nothing to do with mangoes.

The mangoes represented peace, an end of strife, most people in Beijing understood it in this way, and did see them as a positive symbol.

Seeds are much much easier to transport than mangoes.

They built mugs and products with mangoes on it.

I'd hazard that few enough American factory workers would have had much contact with mangoes in 1968, so GP comment is doubly bizarre.

A major theme of the book is how many of the fruits we see today (especially avocados, osange oranges, honey locust pods, possibly mangoes and many other large fruits) originally evolved to be eaten by megafauna.

Obviously if it can solve word problems about apples but can't solve the same problems about mangoes, computation like this is far beyond what they will accomplish in many years.

There are some Mangoes that only taste the same if grown in a certain region of India, and I always heard that was because of the soil + climate.

I agree about some tropical fruits (mangoes and durians especially), but I've had bananas straight off the tree in Southeast Asia and they really didn't taste any different to me.

"The sole decoration was a poster of a dozen varieties of mangoes" That's so cliche.

There is a lot of functionality of Wolfram Alpha that exists for that minuscule chance that somebody will actually query it, so queries matching "[person has object]*, what is the total" is easily understood but it fails when the database doesn't have "mango" or the plural "mangoes" tagged as an object.

Mangoes grow by the side of the road in Queensland, but sell for $3.50 at the supermarket.