lange

Nimm die schlechten Lumpenhüllen; Bist schon lange Knecht gewesen: Nun erfülle meinen Willen!

The ECC Hacks talk by Dan Bernstein and Tanja Lange explains it better than I can.

Laski and Lange obviously disagreed and provided the socialist counter argument.

Freakshow ist ganz toll, aber sehr lange.

It's much easier to end up with security vulnerabilities working with them than with the curves Bernstein and Lange design, which are designed for performance and to be bulletproof in actual use.

It's pretty hard to make a credible argument that Bernstein and Schwabe and Lange did a poor job with Nacl, since the next best alternative is Keyczar, which might not even be maintained anymore.

There was a major debate at the time, now known as the economic calculation debate[1], between socialist economists Harold Laski and Oscar Lange on the one hand and liberal economists Ludwig von Mises and Friedrich von Hayek on the other.

Maggie Lange at Gawker puts it: " Mayer famously took her position at Yahoo while six months pregnant and had her baby last fall.

You don't have to take my word for it; look at the design of the Nacl library --- that's Bernstein, Schwabe, and Lange --- for an example of "just use urandom".

But according to recent research public by DJB & Lange, this might not be the safest choice.

Bernstein, Tanja Lange, and Peter Schwabe, the gold standard of misuse-resistant crypto libraries, relying entirely on urandom and documenting why.

This is Bernstein, Lange, and Schwabe's code.