lacks

Concerning Haskel it still lacks some pragmatism to solve some pratical problems such as install and cabal hell.

But building systems using assembly results in extremely complex code because it lacks the tools to manage complexity well.

Scheme doesn't run in the browser and lacks tooling for readily manipulating the DOM...at least typically.

Humanity has become more liquid but lacks a deep connection to their neighbor as a result.

This just doesn't translate very well to Java 7 which lacks many of the language features to make it more readable.

Also it lacks certain information that is really helpful particularly when dealing with Postgres.

It has many bugs and still lacks many important features, such as favorites management.

There is a sort of just distribution of social responsibility which unfortunately lacks elsewhere.

Debian lacks strong leadership with vision, and so they simply did what they always do which is to blindly follow RedHat's lead.

Barring major battery upgrades, it also literally lacks the power to solve all problems.

If you think Soylent lacks something to be a total food replacement, or have any constructive criticism - please share it with us.

Lisp just as any other programming language won't help figuring the message out because it's rigid and lacks adaptability to the current sender.

The brain in question wouldn't even know what "contact" is because it lacks a sense of touch.

>"Scheme doesn't run in the browser and lacks tooling for readily manipulating the DOM" Meh...