koons

Maybe if Koons or Hirst start selling on Amazon, things will start to even out.

This is why people thinkless of artists like Damien Hirst and Jeff Koons because their hands have never once touched the art.

Damien Hirst does not paint his dots, Jeff Koons has a team of fabricators.

Turns out the dude had one house destroyed then rebuilt to accommodate a 3 meters high Jeff Koons sculpture of two ballerinas.

Most of the art made under the Jeff Koons brand is made by assistants...

If you're into Eminem you'll meet other people with Eminem T-shirts, but you don't see people with Thomas Kinkade or Jeff Koons T-shirts.

Michelangelo, Mozart, Jeff Koons and Taylor Swift are the exception, not the rule.

Robert Koons at UT Austin has published work recently on the subject.

Just like Jeff Koons and Andy did, with their respective factories.

People with deep pockets will pick up a piece by anyone in Aspen, Colorado, and probably not look twice if they (somehow) saw a Koons in a Topeka gallery.

It is in this sense that Jeff Koons is arguably a genius, or at the very least someone capable of playing the game as it exists to near perfection.

> They don't pay $30K for slop art I beg your pardon, but have you heard of Jeff Koons or Kaws?

This is a rejection of artist like Koons or Hockney with their hyper capitalist "it sells" attitude that dominated post Warhol.

It used to have a Jeff Koons "Michael Jackson & Bubbles" statue, and an airstream caravan in it amongst the less eclectic art.

Did Jeff Koons have his "poor people" phase while working as a Wall Street commodities broker before going on to flog shit artworks for millions?

I happened to know the artist Jeff Koons: not a big fan of the "inflated balloon dogs" but I do like his ballerinas.

Koons v Platkin currently at 612 days waiting for an opinion from the 3rd.

Establishment art critics mostly hate Koons, so this seems like a misguided comparison.

That piece is by the artist Jeff Koons, not Damien Hirst.