kinshasa

Brazzaville on the next side of the river is apparently 2 million, and Kinshasa definitely does not look 9x larger.

Roads have trees, they're much wider, there are a lot of open parks, office buildings etc that Kinshasa wouldn't have.

A couple drove across the Democratic Republic of Congo from Lubumbashi to Kinshasa on their own.

And take an satellite shot of Kinshasa (reported population ~19M), rotate or mirror-image it, and then ask GPT-5 to estimate its population.

For an extreme example, look up the catalytic converter gangs in Kinshasa [0].

The whole city of Kinshasa is nauseating due to this.

Is it ok to call Kinshasa the capital of Rhodesia?

I am not sure how you could provide a population center like say Kinshasa with enough calories, never mind trace nutrients, without machines.

Welcome to Kinshasa and Port Moresby respectively.

The origin locale and timeframe (acquired zoonotically from Chimpanzees north of Kinshasa, probably around 1908, travelling by river to Kinshasa and Brazzaville, where social conditions permitted amplification and adaptation to human hosts) have been strongly supported by evidence for about a decade.

I guess Kinshasa is twice as nice as NYC then.

Zoom in on Kinshasa though and you can see that it's almost entirely very densely-packed slums and shantytowns built up against each other, about 100 - 250 square meters in size, with no gardens or back yards.

This means if you zoom into Longyearbyen it will appear several times larger than it should compared to say Kinshasa.

The history of numerous areas, such as Haiti, Kinshasa, and Zimbabwe say that this did not happen.

From Wall St to Kinshasa, people want everyday appliances to just do their jobs and not waste their time.