ideologists

Survival of groups of like-minded end-point ideologists almost always require isolation-like implementation approaches because of this simple issue.

The ideologists wanting to demote economics never seem to want to also throw geology out of the university.

Maybe you don't owe hysterical old ideologists better, but you owe this community better if you're participating in it.

Ideologist will act like ideologists, they don't care about the facts, they care about their narrative.

But those ideologists are right, Flash is evil in so many ways: a) It eats babies.

You probably conflate people trying to maintain their traditions actively (as most Japanese do) to vocal ideologists about maintaining traditions.

The only market where this logic doesn't apply is the Silkroad-type market and the stuff that caters to gold-bug/libertarian ideologists.

The idea is that some green ideologists think that when they don't need to drive a car because they don't leave their city, no one needs to drive a car.

That said, it's nonsense to say that low transaction costs (that's what efficiency means to the end user) is the sole factor for anyone besides Silkroad users and ideologists.

But you ideologists just ignore that because you want to bash the App Store.

It's unnecessary meddling in the workings of a free market, meant to appease ideologists.

In HN, I've been seeing a lot of links with useful information be unnecessarily flagged by ideologists.

The best theories are completely inconsistent with the scientific method and "biological machine" ideologists.

From that link: "Block evil Adobe Flash" Great, more ideologists.

Those "anti-death" ideologists are just kooks trying whatever fringe BS they find (including "cryogenics"), and they do more harm than good regading helping good science...