hemingway

Perhaps the same is true of CS: we don't need everyone to be Hemingway here: plenty of jobs just need programming.

For Hemingway and many others, it is better to have the words at hand than forcibly to use them.

It's that Hemingway developed one limited style and used that to tell the stories he cared about, whereas Joyce's style was constantly expanding.

Lawrence, I think) One can find oneself reading the earlier, better Hemingway by light of the later, which is unfortunate.

Winner Take Nothing - Hemingway It's a great collection of short stories.

It's not like I get in a tiff when people say they like Hemingway more.

But probably not everyone can become Hemingway or Borges or Nabokov.

That’s like saying locking up books will inspire kids to be innovative writers, because they won’t be tempted to copy passages from a Hemingway novel.

Writers who like Joyce over Hemingway are also invariably writers with a more open stance on writing, and focus more on the craft than about the story.

I wish I could get across to you what you are missing because appreciating Hemingway introduced me to a different way of enjoying literature.

Heh, Hemingway is a cute idea, I had not seen that before.

It was the first Hemingway book that I ever read.

It reminded me of a quote from Hemingway's book, The Sun Also Rises: - “How did you go bankrupt?” Bill asked.

Jonathan Yardley, who used to review for the Washington Post, said that "Bad Hemingway" contests were pointless, for Papa had long ago retired the prize.

Funny, having just moved to New York City for the summer, to get Hemingway's impression of it: "It’s a town you come to for a short time.

Never worn." attributed to Ernest Hemingway.

Hemingway certainly had a sparse writing style, which doubtless reflected the fact that he had been a reporter.

A counter-example in six words: For Sale: Baby shoes, never worn is a short story by Ernest Hemingway.

There's a similar criticism of Hemingway's works[1]: that his prose is stagnant and unchanging.