granick

Working more closely with the EFF, and perhaps Jennifer Granick at Stanford, seems like the best way to proceed.

It is based on these guidelines that Jennifer Granick estimated a sentence of 1-2 years, if convicted.

According to Jennifer Granick the sentencing guideline (assuming trumped-up loss calculations) would have been on the order of 1-2 years.

You don't have to take my word about the maximum sentence though: Jennifer Granick was very critical of the U.

As Granick states: > [T]he court is not constrained to sentence as the government suggests.

Jennifer Granick writes: > He could plead guilty to all 13 felony charges and the government would argue for a six-month prison term...

> According to Jennifer Granick the sentencing guideline (assuming trumped-up loss calculations) would have been on the order of 1-2 years.

Stallman, Jennifer Granick and Evgeny Morozov.

[1] However I wouldn't say that 215 is a red herring -- it'll be a significant victory if it sunsets, for reasons Jennifer Granick describes at [2].

Someone should pay for Jennifer Granick on this one, since she started her career defending vehicle things like DUIs, and also has the expertise in tech, which is probably a rare combination.

The Federal sentencing guidelines would have recommended a sentence in the range of 1-2 years (according to Jennifer Granick of all people, who is decidedly not a fan of what happened to Aaron Swartz).

Jennifer Granick was a friend of Aaron Swartz's, the Director of Civil Liberties at the Stanford Center for Internet and Society, and more or less the go-to lawyer for #hack for something like a decade.

The article says, however, that remains an "unanswered legal question" in the United States, according to Jennifer Granick at Stanford's CIS.

I met Jennifer Granick as a result, and learned the "if you can possibly avoid it, never ever set foot inside federal court" rule, which has subsequently served me quite well.

Either way, what I got from Granick was that the worst element of the sentencing calculation by far was the loss calculations (which could essentially easily be "blank check"ed by MIT), not that the judge is allowed to consider related conduct proven by the defendant.

Jennifer Granick's is the only name you'll hear from more than one person.

From Jennifer Granick's post [1] decrying everything that the prosecutors did to Aaron: > He would be looking at 15 to 21 months of incarceration.

Granick covered this point already, and her treatment was comprehensive.