gondola

A gondola ride to the bottom of the Grand Canyon would be like a gondola ride to the top of Everest.

The gondola is certainly nifty, but the resort could be built a couple miles away from the rim without impacting the tourist friendly improvement.

Also, having a gondola that goes up there would make it easier to remove dead bodies of climbers.

> A gondola ride to the bottom of the Grand Canyon would be like a gondola ride to the top of Everest.

A gondola to a mountain climber is hardly the same thing as a helmet to a motorcyclist.

This new-fangled gondola will also gain pedigree and heritage over time, to garner a worthy history of its own.

So a gondola to the top would destroy the very value it was supposed to provide.

So consider the gondola going to the deepest part, the prime spot and totally letting the car-bound tourists having it.

All you'd need to do is pressurize the gondola, and there'd be no need for acclimatization.

Build a couple miles away, have a dedicated road to the gondola facility at the rim.

Check out Nick Chu's blog, the Gondola Project [0], where he's been documenting urban gondolas around the world for years.

The gondola got built in a more suitable location, to the top of a nearby ridge, and now everyone is happy.

The north side only works because it is remote—if you set up a gondola from the south side to the north side, then your "just plan a trip to the north side" advice won't work.

Right now, our internal framework (codenamed Gondola, but subject to change), includes: * A full ORM which generates tables from structs and allows relations between models, as well as a simple querying system based on Go functions which joins the tables automatically for you e.g.