goalie

The goalie is going to go one way or another and there's a 50% chance he'll guess right.

In many cases, the goalie is looking in a completely different direction than where the ball is.

The goalie is there to stop the other team from scoring, but is in no way responsible for his/her team to score goals.

You just couldn't get a goalie who was big enough to fill the entire net, so the increased goalie size would limit his mobility and make him worse.

With enough speed and accuracy, a shot to the bottom corner (just sneaking by the post) will beat the goalie even if the goalie dives in the right direction.

It wouldn't matter if the goalie went always left or always right or just stood there every time.

They need at least two more elite players (including a top 3 goalie) to make that happen.

A shot to the upper corner will always beat the goalie; just can't get there in time.

Hockey goalie view is the only scenario i can currently think of that would make me really want to use it.

If a goalie leaps left or right and fails to stop the goal, he can claim that he tried his best.

This at least seems to correlate something goalie related, provided Griffin was not drawing from a data-pool that was biased towards goalies.

I hope someone could look up a discussion on this soccer goalie example: I never really understood it.

They have a 2-for-1 special after 5pm every day!" "It's your friend Dave, shot through a red filter and wearing a hockey goalie's mask.

You have taken things to an absurd extreme and gotten one result, I can "relax the assumptions" to the opposite extreme and get the opposite result: Suppose the goalie only blocks 10% of shots when guessing correctly, and the kicker makes 80% to the strong side and 50% to the weak side.