galaxies

The logic of why things happen (why elliptical galaxies or small galaxies are not good for life) is only easy to explain if you master the subjects very well.

This matter is no good for normal matter so it is transported far away from stars/galaxies and dumped.

And observations regarding other galaxies colliding (as mentioned in the article) migth be explained by gravitational phase shifting.

Notice the 'aliens' and the galaxies and the the distant worlds that he is visiting while tripping.

The mass deficit observed in tidal dwarf galaxies is also quite strong evidence against just dark matter.

We can collect statistics on how common such objects are in our own galaxy and nearby galaxies using gravitational micro-lensing surveys.

On a related note, I hate stumbling across sci-fi novels on Amazon that conflate solar systems with galaxies.

Not to mention exploring other galaxies which are millions of light years away.

This just means these attempts at creating a complete theory are probably wrong, not that there isn't something funky going on with galaxies that isn't completely accounted for by dark matter.

I guess the same dynamics apply on the scale of galaxies, which should explain the violation of the expected rotation curve.

The article opens talking about exoplanets rather than very distant galaxies.

For example, where you have galaxies with lots of regular matter there is also lots of dark matter, but it has a slightly different distribution.

"That is, all that we are certain about [is] the dark mass, not dark matter, let alone to say about the dark 'particle'." Particles of matter move through and displace the dark mass, including 'particles' as large as galaxies and galaxy clusters.

Galaxies, nebulae, and such are much further away than Pluto, but that is more than made up for by how mind-boggingly large they are.

For myself, I can on days off, do two very different things that are very immersive: watch tv series, or play Star Wars: Online Galaxies.