gadolinium

The presence of the gadolinium is not a complication.

Gadolinium is toxic so contrasts trap it with protective molecules that hold the gadolinium until it leaves the body (most leave via the kidneys, but some also leave via liver/gallbladder).

My son had an MRI with gadolinium- turns out he is allergic to it, he developed a full-body itchy rash.

In the aftermath of this, scientists discovered that Gadolinium is retained in the body after MRI scans to a small amount.

Do you think most people are capable of understanding why an expert could be wrong about gadolinium but right about vaccines?

One dosage of gadolinium contrast and the body couldn’t handle the toxic element which is a heavy metal for the body.

There have been no cases of NSF in over ten years after newer gadolinium contrast agents have displaced the problematic ones.

The same doctors, manufacturers, and FDA has said that MRI contrast containing another heavy metal, gadolinium, is safe.

Many healthy people like me became chronically ill due to Gadolinium based contrast agent.

There is no new information around clinical changes that one can attribute to gadolinium.

Some fraction of gadolinium escapes depending on the structure of the protective molecules.

> I am positive that you were not told that '[gadolinium] is perfectly safe' because there is a well-known complication of gadolinium administration.

Biochemically, the ones where the gadolinium was trapped in harder "complexes", those were more stable (less accumulation).

A human would usually write "Gd2O3" for gadolinium oxide, whereas an AI would default to "Gd₂O₃".

Some quick notes to aid in a constructive discussion - bear with me, it's been a while and I've left research and since worked as a software developer, chuckle: - Different gadolinium agents have vastly different "buildup" characteristics - some are better, some are worse.

Gadolinium retention has been shown to occur, but has not been reliably linked to any clinical symptoms.

Gadolinium accumulation in the brain doesn't sound good for you...

Gadolinium tissue retention also does not interfere in interpretation.