fuels

While batteries have very energy density compared to petroleum fuels, on average it's much better (compared to petroleum fuels) than their specific energy.

Apply it as a tax to all fossil fuels and imports from countries without a comparable tax scheme.

You can paint a very rosy picture of any transport technology if you assume away fossil fuels.

But when it is favorable economically speaking then fossil fuels and nuclear will be used as well.

If 39% of Danes' electricity completely displaced the same amount of fossil fuels, my jaw would hit the floor.

But it's not, because most of the rich people who need fossil fuels to stay rich would rather kill it.

Energy density (MJ/L) for batteries is lower than petroleum fuels by the same order of magnitude as the specific energy.

There are about 9 different formulations of unleaded fuels flying in experimental aircraft right now.

The hardest thing about algal fuels is keeping your bioreactor working at peak efficiency.

We are living in the generation that will be most remembered, not for the Internet, but for the transition off fossil fuels.

The fear that fossil fuels will run out in the near term is gone.

Their energy density is 15 ~ 40 times lower than petroleum fuels whereas their energy density is 50 ~ >100 times lower.

Under the "do-nothing” model (effectively our current model) we just keep burning all the fossil fuels until they are all gone.

Please name the model or whatever logical progression you are using to arrive at this idea, too My model is our current “do-nothing” model where all the fossil fuels that can be burnt will be burnt.