eschatological

The party as a whole is uninterested in governing beyond seeking revenge and satisfying the charismatic eschatological movement that drives them.

A few weeks' intensive study would likely allow you to sling eschatological BS with the best of them.

It's some subset of US Evangelists using Israel as a puppet for whatever eschatological purpose they have in mind.

And then there's Thiel and ilk waxing eschatological, adding a whole other layer to the scheme.

Edit: retracting the following: >The reason it's popular is that it plays to some deep eschatological anxieties shared by many people.

Rather, we should just set eschatological eccentrics aside when it comes to orienting our political outlook.

It is an eschatological religious idea for a mind based on scientism.

Your fundamental logical fallacy which is still unaddressed You found ONE eschatological hadith about end-times and declared it proves Islam mandates present day violence.

But man doesn't need god for absolute truths that govern their lives and weighs their actions to exist, doesn't need god for eschatological consequences, etc.

The bubble bursting has almost become eschatological for deniers.

Seems more than a bit eschatological, but who knows.

Few are saying that these things are eschatological inevitabilities.

Maybe, "will a plurality of people believe that Jesus has returned in 2025?" Eschatological cults routinely convince small numbers of followers that the end is coming.

> You're taking one eschatological reference about future conflict and claiming it makes all of Islam "violent." No.

But when I provided you with proper context, multiple supporting hadiths, and explained the distinction between eschatological prophecy and prescriptive religious practice, you called it "gobbledygook" and fled the discussion.

Like saying "this car has a red door, therefore the entire car is red." You're taking one eschatological reference about future conflict and claiming it makes all of Islam "violent." That's not how logic works.