entrants

The problem is that it's really apples-to-oranges: large, not-growing-very-fast car companies are a very different beast from small, rapidly-growing, risky new entrants.

There are economies of scale that allow one player to dominate a market and prevent new entrants.

Create continual legal battles with the local authorities to scare off new entrants to the market.

One or two entrants would hit a 9 or 10, and they were obvious to every judge at the table.

The number of developers grows every year as well, with far more new entrants coming from younger generations than older ones.

The barriers to entry are so high that it's nearly impossible for new entrants.

French labour laws in general overwhelmingly advantage the older(as in already employed), and established workers and disadvantage younger workers and new entrants.

The musical skills really only come into play when price expectations rise high enough that new entrants to the market can be supported.

Late to market entrants don't have a great track record of user acquisition.

This market is also loaded with entrants, due to (what I assume) is a very low barrier-to-entry.

They even have techniques to prevent bias or judges recognizing the source of the meat (overlapping panels, hundreds of entrants, randomized category assignment).

In this case, incumbent taxi firms could be in cutthroat competition with each other, while still lobbying to prevent new entrants into the market.

Advertising isn't really a question of "morality" I would allege that logic, morality, and competitive business tactics all align with the sentiment that ISPs should be immediately decoupled from cable companies and we should allow market entrants to compete there.