emotionally

The whole point of the game is for the AI to scar you emotionally, until you do something you'll regret.

These kinds of CEO are just emotionally clueless, and nothing you say or do will change their minds.

We respond to risk emotionally rather than rationally, claiming all risk needs to be removed.

And two: that the goals emotionally intelligent people set are worthwhile, even thought they might sound like complete nonsense at first.

Rationalizations are excuses, but just sound better, as they are intended to resolve the dissonance so you can function somewhat normally emotionally.

BTW, a lot of people are challenged with undestanding how they actually feel emotionally.

Or the accessibility of weapons in situations where you are emotionally unstable?

If anything, I'd suspect that emotionally competent people are better at building harmful products and exploiting flaws in the brain.

It's not a matter of Ruby programmers being emotionally invested.

- If somebody is trying to emotionally hurt another person because of who they are that should stop.

I am isolated because I isolate myself; not physically, but intellectually and emotionally.

His ideas belong on the same scrap heap that fascism does: A way to rally a crowd over emotionally charged language that doesn't add up in real life.

What does "emotionally brilliant" mean, and how would it benefit users?

Rather it denotes "not fully emotionally developed" which is usually a judgement placed on their current behaviour.

- If somebody is trying to emotionally hurt another person by calling them names arbitrary names ("you fag" when the person is in fact hetero etc) is not a good thing.

--> putting more emotionally competent people in the industry", but it's far from clear to me how the latter gets to the former.