edits

That's because they are supposed to make edits (cutting out the commercial breaks, for instance), the errors happen because the edits are done hastily, in order to release first.

If they were already editing the video, why didn't they make their edits at times where they wouldn't be obvious?

The guidelines are against edits, but they also seem to be against flashy vague terms, and a change like this is useful.

For example, if you make edits on stackoverflow, the site might decide to challenge you with a captcha from time to time.

Also, it's very limited in the type of edits it can make.

I put a notice on Wikipedia's conflict of interest noticeboard, which will start the process by which promotional edits are dealt with.

Yeah, my remarks now lack their context with the deletions/edits.

As for sharing edits to documents, that's probably best done as a premeditated thing with people you know, which is where merkle trees'll be useful for verification.

It doesn't matter that the edits are probably innocuous.

To head this off at the pass: the blining is very disturbing in the first few minutes but with some time the brain edits them out, and after a while the information contained in there actually is useful.

We would absolutely love your edits and updates!

But yes, in Haskell people are in the habit of writing the type signatures, even though the compiler does not require them, so in this case edits are needed.

We do not live in a universe where "issues uploading" a video results in edits to that video.

How likely is it that these anomalies are the result of deliberate human edits?" Several HN readers are involved (professionally or as a hobby) in "film stuff" - editing software; cameras; etc.