drupal

For a large percentage, they're running a CMS like Wordpress or Drupal or whatever, where the codebase is public anyways.

Thanks for the list, it's a little surprising to see WordPress and Drupal doing so well.

And as there was written in the article about Wordpress, Drupal has the same problem.

To a great extent, Drupal can be seen as a point-and-click website development kit.

I am currently doing a bit of Drupal for a client, there are a TON of half baked modules.

Most of the issues with firefox, drupal, whatever are coming from plugins anyway.

When I first started, my predecessor had been fighting with upgrading PHP so that we could run Drupal on CentOS...

It went from published to bots hacking Drupal installs within seven hours.

Btw, mail from my Drupal system also always ended up in spam.

We can just build it with Drupal and it'll be fine.

The recent Drupal exploit is a good example of this.

Have you considered the Drupal framework?

Drupal/Wordpress developers are an absolute joke." What a crock!

Its hard to have a straight face when he recommends things like getting rid of our Drupal infrastructure because, "I can just make a website in Access and run it off the network drive," and other suggestions of that caliber.

Drupal gives the ability for users to install CMS on php version 5.2 or higher.

Drupal, MediaWiki, Laravel, Slim, it's a pretty long list, and it includes projects that target Serious Devlopers.

* Developing content managed sites using Drupal, including creating custom modules, themes etc.