daycare

A two income family (pretty tough to live in SF if you aren't) means daycare - and daycare costs, conservatively, over $2,000 a month per kid.

My son is 6 and many of the kids he interacts with at school and daycare play Minecraft.

If there was daycare in her building, however, that would have made the decision to go back much easier.

Frankly, in IT/CS a lot of higher degrees are little more than adult daycare.

So their entire lives are tax free(even while they are using resources paid by tax), but for me income for private school/daycare, mortgage, etc aren't.

Gardening, daycare etc don't pay even that well.

There was the absurd McMartin daycare nonsense.

On a regular day, here is my schedule: - Wake up whenever kids wake up (usually 6AM-7AM) - Help with their breakfast, getting ready for daycare along with my wife.

If daycare of your child costs $500, and your full-time job gets you $500, how many people in this situation will drop their job and become a stay at home parents?

My wife is returning to work in a month at the end of her 1 year (Canada) maternity leave, but the cost of daycare is enough to make the decision difficult.

And I would agree that the other 'perks/benefits' need championing in cases where firms can't match market value (whether it be equity, healthcare, daycare, or even free beers/billiards on Fridays).

/r/conspiracy was harassing a daycare in Utah.

You send ten more drones on different missions to some daycare or something to "punish" the enemy for breaking the Geneva convention.

I.e., it would be completely useless to build more community gardens, fix our "crumbling infrastructure" or provide free daycare for working mothers?

If something were to happen to me I'd want my wife to still be able to pay for Daycare, Mortgage, etc for as long as our savings would allow.