cuke

And as many people in the Cuke threads pointed out, Cuke fails, too.

Developers (especially consultants) would like to believe that if they write a cuke test and it passes, then their job is done.

I'd expect cuke, if pronounced like cucumber would be queueck or cuck depending on which cu in cucumber you're using.

Someone can write code based off Cuke tests in Ruby or.

If I wanted to change something, I would first write a cuke for it, write specs as necessary, and only as necessary write actual code.

I'm glad Cuke decided to dump web_steps.

Maybe there are documents out there, somewhere, that unambiguously describe what business people want and whether they've gotten it, but until I see those mythical creatures, I'm willing to cut Cuke some slack.

For a single developer who hasn't worked on a codebase before, or who is returning to a codebase after some time Cuke steps will definitely improve their ability to understand what the code is doing and by providing a regression test suite improve the quality and probably speed of their output.

What is actually bad about people not recognizing your brand correctly Yeah I'm sure Cuke and Papsi would have no problem with that as their coca-cola soft drink products are instantly recognizable as soon as you drink them.

I have seen countless hours wasted on making Cuke/Gherkin "pretty" instead of accomplishing anything for the business.

We hope you will enjoy connecting with friends, family, and advertisers while reading news brought to you by Cuke(R)!

For me Cuke-ish tests are about alignment and communication - not about having non-developers write tests.

Cuke seems like extra busywork job security rather than GTD.