creators

How do you propose to give the creators of the content you're visiting revenue so they can continue?

The reason Apple does this is to push content creators away from the Web and into native apps.

We're becoming the destination for content collaborations, with hundreds of brands and thousands of creators using the platform today.

It gives content creators more leverage in negotiations/royalties & consumers more content, different features, etc.

This sort of competition is a good thing for both content creators & consumers.

I've certainly kept the content creators from gaining an additional ad impression, which is how they make money.

I'm not so sure that's good for the content creators whom they're stepping all over in their climb to competition.

We help Publishers, Content Creators and Advertisers generate more online video revenue through sophisticated technology and a unique view of how our world is changing.

If Apple devices offer an ad-free web but not ad-free apps, then users will drift toward the web, just as content creators drift toward apps.

> The reason Apple does this is to push content creators away from the Web and into native apps.

It's only the content creators who think their consumers feel entitled to free content because they're too stupid to come up with better business models to market their content.

Its creators intentionally cast their gaze aside.

Content creators aren't "putting it up for free" - they're putting it up with ads attached.

I think he still provides a good warning to heed even with his "content creators" bias.

It will be interesting how this turns out for "content creators".

I'm not sympathetic whatsoever to "content creators" bellyaching stories about the good ole days when they had control of the monopolies.