covalent

If you take an O=O molecule (= means double covalent bond) and add some fuel, you get fire.

This means that it is hard for Si to form double or triple covalent bonds; this is something C can do very easily.

The ADP and Pi are mechanically squeezed against each other in order to create the covalent bound.

The molecule that comes out at the end has a different covalent structure than the molecule that you start with.

You can model glass like a bunch of tiny spheres (atoms) joined by sticks (covalent bonds).

You talk first to a Chemistry student about covalent and ionic bonds, you don't start immediately on Quantum Mechanics and Orbital Theory.

And if there are stronger bonds in polywater, what are they, then, covalent bonds?

Any element with fewer valence electrons will be ineffective in forming latices with covalent bonds (as they have too few valence electrons).

Because of the physics that underlies chemistry, covalent bonds cannot be as heat-resistant as ionic bonds (as found in salts and other inorganic compounds).

It's a distinct molecule, created by the scission of 3 covalent bonds.

Are you going to empirically verify the concept of covalent bonding?

From QM we know that such classical models completely and utterly fail to reproduce almost all important bonding behavior (certainly anything covalent).

My personal choices would have been "Covalent" or "Ionic," but naturally those are taken already.

In medicine, for instance, "radiation" without a modified almost always refers to "ionizing radiation" -- ie with enough energy to induce DNA damage by creating free radicals or inducing covalent linkages.

Shouldn't this package be called "covalent"?

So they don't use Apache, they instead hire a company like Covalent which offers a little value-add on top of Apache, but basically, they're "someone to blame" if/when it doesn't work.

Covalent versus metallic bonds between atoms.