coulter

Scandal worthy shenanigans such as dogs registered to vote and renown critic Ann Coulter falsifying her voter registration.

Noam Chomsky tries to hide his politics in the trappings of science while Ann Coulter doesn't hide anything.

Do controversial statements that Noam Chomsky and Ann Coulter are roughly equivalent in some way belong on the top of HN?

Just some anecdotal whinging and a couple quotes from the Ann Coulter of feminism.

Like Ann Coulter or Rachel Maddow, or even John Stewart or Matt Drudge, his job is to entertain you with the news.

The mandril stained, your coulter blunted In the smooth lea-field of my brow.

Do Michael Moore / Ann Coulter interviews belong on the top of HN?

In the end, Ann Coulter turns out not to be a republican.

I would be interested in a citation for this observation as far as Coulter goes.

Or when Anne Coulter does a Q&A on Reddit.

Have you ever seen Ann Coulter in action?

Do you want Ann Coulter links here, too?

This method is discussed in "Anatomy of Hatha Yoga" by David Coulter, Chapter 2.

Comparing and contrasting "almost everybody" to "Ann Coulter", and I think it's easy to draw such a distinction.

Well Ted Nugent (not to mention Ann Coulter) got away with calling Obama a "monkey," and he's the highly respected darling of the GOP, whose endorsement is sought after and appreciated by not only Republican senators and congressmen, but Mitt Romney himself.

Good piece but it neglects another category of writing to its own detriment, that on the opposite end of the spectrum of "pleasing everyone", namely, writing which exists for no other reason than to provoke a response (aka the Ann Coulter school of writing).

Coulter is an unabashed demagogue, Chomsky is an intellectual and academic who happens to have strong political opinions.

Can't the same thing be said about people like Rush Limbaugh and Ann Coulter?

If I would have hacked Ann Coulter's webpage I probably would have defaced it in a much more malicious way.