A person who, or thing that, constructs.
Used in a Sentence
constructors
Definitions, parts of speech, synonyms, and sentence examples for constructors.
Editorial note
Whether or not move constructors should leave objects in a 'valid state', whatever you mean by that, is hotly contested.
Examples17
Definitions4
Parts of speech1
Quick take
A person who, or thing that, constructs.
Meaning at a glance
The clearest senses and uses of constructors gathered in one view.
(object-oriented programming) A class method that creates and initializes each instance of an object.
(crosswording) A person who creates crossword puzzles.
Definitions
Core meanings and parts of speech for constructors.
noun
A person who, or thing that, constructs.
noun
(object-oriented programming) A class method that creates and initializes each instance of an object.
noun
(crosswording) A person who creates crossword puzzles.
noun
(automotive) A company which, or individual who, builds racing vehicles. In Formula One, constructor status is strictly defined by the rules, but in other motorsports the term is merely a descriptor. Depending on the racing rules, some constructors (e.g. Cosworth) may provide vehicles to racing teams who are not themselves constructors, while others are both teams and constructors (Ducati Corse, Scuderia Ferrari).
Example sentences
Whether or not move constructors should leave objects in a 'valid state', whatever you mean by that, is hotly contested.
This approach reminds me of when people say, hey JS has classes and constructors just like Java does!
It is true for all copy constructors in C++ since the standard allows compilers to perform copy elision.
Your this pointer, constructors and destructors must be called explicitly and error handing as well is explicit.
In addition this doesn't at all help us delimit the space of all possible constructors.
Lack of support for multiple constructors of a class made me scratch my head, but they added this support in a recent version.
I also suspect you'll encounter something like the halting problem when trying to figure out which constructors aren't constructable.
Any language which has constructors already has the best DI integration available.
The pros are pretty cool and some of the issues I mentioned in the readme have been fixed now (multiple constructors).
But move constructors are almost always basically a memcpy() sometimes followed by some zeroing of the old data, never heap allocation nor expensive atomic ops.
At worst you'll encounter constructors where this question is unanswerable (e.g.
Idiomatic Haskell would make custom types, with smart constructors if necessary.
Quote examples
Virtual constructors is not a "feature", it's (just like various additions to C#/Java) is an afterthought patch to a rigid static world.
About referencing "this": It can be very useful when writing object constructors, if you always reference an object with the constructor's name.
- Resembles a "post-OOP" language due to being pre-OOP: these days it seems to be popular for languages to encourage things like: -> composition over inheritance -> using more dumb structures to store aggregate data rather than making everything a class with manually written constructors/getters/setters, hidden fields, invariants, etc.
Proper noun examples
Constructors may need to allocate a sentinel, I see no reason for the move constructor to do so.
Constructors are very different in Haskell than (insert imperative Lang).
Frequently asked questions
Short answers drawn from the clearest meanings and examples for this word.
How do you use constructors in a sentence?
Whether or not move constructors should leave objects in a 'valid state', whatever you mean by that, is hotly contested.
What does constructors mean?
A person who, or thing that, constructs.
What part of speech is constructors?
constructors is commonly used as noun.