confession

The accuracy of the details of the confession are equivalent to a confession under torture.

The confession is a charade, usually coordinated in advance with the prosecution.

The office is not a confession booth, or even a private household.

There are other things that are never lawful - ordering someone to sign a confession or answer questions.

For those 23 days he'll be beaten half to death in order to extract a 'confession'.

Amazing that it took basically a confession to find these guys, what a different world it was 35 years ago.

What about the bit where the police stitched the interrogation tape together so that the accused has a recorded confession?

Full confession though, I still visit once in a blue moon to see if anything has changed.

In neither case should the details of the confession be treated as true.

True confession: I tend to cycle slowly through OSX, Linux, and Windows 8.1 because I like a little change.

Indeed, he is about to be tortured into a confession and then subjected to endless human rights violations for which there is no recourse.

First of all because this is a confession that something must be wrong with you, but mostly because you should not try to reach this.

There should be no shame in such a "confession" -- don't most great things come from deciding something crappy could be better?

But the constitution continues: "No person shall be convicted of treason unless on the testimony of two witnesses to the same overt act, or on confession in open court." Which, actually, may not be an evidentiary standard that could be met here, assuming Greenwald and Poitras don't testify.

Confession: I approached Docker like a maniac before humbly working my way through the official Docker user guide slowly and methodically, without distractions, doing all the exercises (and taking notes with questions).