commenters

This could possibly explain why commenters who know these guys are giving good reviews, while US-based commenters steeped in SV culture find this document strange.

As other commenters have pointed out the first few votes (in <30min) are the ones that matter most.

Both this piece, and most commenters, seem to miss the point about where Github's value comes from.

There is probably more traction from what you are saying that some of the commenters suggest.

And it's possible that the article on Apple under discussion is false, as some commenters claim.

Lots of other commenters have remarked about the lacking rigor and narrow scope of the tests.

Their bias got so bad that even their typically anti-patent commenters called it out on one of their recent articles.

The commenters here rightly point that the returned Start menu is even worse than it was during the tech preview.

It's so bizarre how offended people get (the Facebook commenters in this instance) when scrutinizing the person used in an ad.

Something else that's real on the internet, and poisonous, is commenters groundlessly accusing each other of those things, or insinuating them.

The loneliness concern doesn't seem to resonate with the commenters here, so I dug in to the article's footnoted references.

Distinct from other 3G commenters here, though, I found it more than fast enough to keep up with my scribbles.

There are other good summaries but here is mine, in no particular order (All is C&P, no editing other than adding in my own commentary in "[]", putting commenters questions in quotes, and adding in "Mark" where "he" and other pronouns were used.