capitalistic

He's not talking about the info-tech industry being capitalistic, but rather some of the contradictions inherent within a capitalistic info-tech industry.

The difference between what he makes from it and what he pays me for it is capitalistic exploitation.

It's still a great idea and will likely have many fans, but this is a pretty capitalistic product.

Like forest fires, recessions are natural to capitalistic market and any attempt to prevent it only adds kindling.

Information technology, and really the internet, have worked around traditional anti-capitalistic forces like taxes and regulation very effectively.

That's because the benefits are expensive, from a capitalistic point of view - six weeks maternity leave?

It's often overlooked - it was very industrialized country, with long capitalistic traditions, and democracy before WW2.

It's absolutely capitalistic, but there are many people who would call it economically inefficient or irrational.

Probably as close as it can get given that it exists within a capitalistic society.

All the mentioned countries are successfull capitalistic countries with better safeguards and policies.

A barter economy is a free market, but not usually a capitalistic one.

Our country was founded and continues to run on capitalistic principles.

An industry, arguably the most aggressively capitalistic." That would be historically ironic, wouldn't it?

Capitalistic economies in the region do much better, so who do you want me to compare to who is "fair?" Brazil, Argentia, Chile?

That's certainly his right as the business owner, and that sentiment shared more widely might be better for society, but there's nothing particularly "capitalistic" about it.

Capitalistic economies start out that way for a while, and then lock in opportunities to the people who need them the least.