camps

The fact there are two camps (GG and anti-GG) means there was a split.

Around 40.000 people were made homeless and had to live in tented camps for weeks, many for months.

If you're bad at breaking the rules, you go to the reeducation camps or to the firing squad.

If two of the most widely languages can't fit into one of the two camps the idea must be obsolete.

Boot camps are intense: there is a heavy time commitment (12 weeks, 6 days per week, 11 hours per day).

We made a conscious decision to try and hire someone from these camps as an experiment.

It is an ideal place for coding camps and sprints - rentals are cheap.

But in my eyes, Ousterhout's point wasn't to divide languages into two camps.

I'm impressed by code-camps as web development and software development takes a long time but code campers are green.

My wife and I conduct Lego WeDo and Scratch and camps for kids 6-9 & 9-12.

I'm very suspicious of the claim that these boot camps can turn novices into job-ready professionals in just 3 months.

There aren't really two 'camps', there are just comfortable positions on a scale, places where people are acclimatised to the trade-offs by their experience.

I am curious about this because different camps scream about its "everything is a stringish thing casted as needed" type of language.

It's difficult to imagine how a law could fail harder than "helps bad guys send good guys to death camps" -- but here we are.

The GMO argument like so many things now seems to be divided into "Best thing since sliced bread" or "Bringer of the end of the world" camps.