broder

And at the end of the day - I don't know Broder, I don't care about Broder - I don't really care about Tesla.

Musk still hasn't refuted the fact that Tesla engineers gave Broder really poor advice during the trip.

Elon accused Broder of faking the review and it's been clear that was the distraction he wanted from the beginning.

The core facts were that Broder followed Tesla's advice and, by following the advice, the car ran out of charge.

If the people Broder called gave him bad advice, maybe it's because something was inaccurate?

But neither the Times nor Broder are in the clear, nor should they be.

If they made those issues clear, then Broder would have expected the effect.

They aren't hard to find, especially because Broder had been to a supercharger station before and didn't have any problems finding it then.

The most hilarious part of Musk's ego-trip is that the longer he extends the feud, the worse he looks and the better Broder looks.

There's also the matter of Broder being wrong in his broad thesis (testing the supercharger network) since he refused to charge when he needed to.

I can appreciate the argument that Broder was lying if there was a very large discrepancy between the claims and the data.

I thought Broder lied about how fast he was going for the whole trip.

What do you mean that "Broder did get it right"?

Musk didn't produce the call logs, and the "data" corroborates most of Broder's claims regarding what happened during the drive.

You are letting your blind faith in Musk cloud your reasoning abilities "Say, why hasn't Broder offered to repeat the drive?

He has everything on the line, and everything he's worked for " Gives him more incentive to fight the NYT and try to paint Broder as an evil man.

Broder may have made some mistakes with the precision of his account, but it doesn't make him a liar.

That's a small fix that probably would have alleviated a lot of Broder's emotionally bad experience with the car.

But the thing is - I don't care about Broder.