axes

You want to figure out which of the 2^n axes in the n-qubit register your black box negates.

It doesn't hurt that Apple tends to execute best-in-class on each of these axes, but that's tactics not strategy.

It's a superior good (along some axes and for some people) and is valued as such.

It is like lumberjacks sitting around discussing axes for hours instead of actually chopping the trees.

In case it isn't obvious, you can move around in the x, y, z axes.

This is at least partly because of the number of well-meaning and excited amateurs who continually reinvent technologies and sharpen axes.

A good data analysis lesson here: Make sure to use multiple Y axes if you are compared line graphs like this.

How about those lumberjacks who have been chopping trees for a while, and feel that better axes might be available somewhere?

Sometimes during a gold rush, you are better off selling pick axes to miners.

And since each of those axes are defined by a ratio to an Earth value, zeroes would only be found for objects with the following properties: - Infinite mean radius.

The ESI defines a hyperspherical gradient across several different axes of earth similarity.

Let's not saddle ourselves with stone axes for the rest of our lives.

From Tikhon Jelvis' answer: "I personally rank languages on three largely orthogonal axes: productivity, maintainability and performance.

And, I'd argue, Firefox is far, far, far from "technically superior" on any number of axes, regardless.

Apple already chose to make themselves a certifying authority for software on other axes, so I don't find it surprising they sanitize content in the US-flavor of "family friendly" similar to other game consoles.