anti-gun

Given how anti-gun the MSM is, do you doubt for a second that if citizens had comitted such an atrocity it wouldn't be nationwide, probably world wide screaming headlines?

Some more interesting facts: Nations with stringent anti-gun laws generally have substantially higher murder rates than those that do not.

Which would require an anti-gun state's people passing one of these, and the state then using it as more flypaper.

It'd actually work against the anti-gun lobby, because the pro-gun lobby would be able to point to the relatively unchanged stats.

We can rant about pro-gun/anti-gun stuff, but as with a great many things the discussion will just be people talking past each other.

If you are anti-gun or a pacifist, you can just avoid those establishments.

But since then, we've seen a ratchet effect where anti-gun politicians have tried to impose more and more restrictions.

You have a city in an extremely gun-tolerant state (Washington) that has lower violent crime than a city in an extremely anti-gun area (Surrey).

NJ especially, I assume, is a model the anti-gun lobby wants for the whole country.

I'm an anti-gun person, so I think the answer is having no regulations of 3d printers, but coming down hard on people who misuse 3d printers in making very dangerous things.

This coincided with the rise of the anti-gun left, including Sen.

Also some of the recent wave of anti-gun legislation sweeps in weapons used for hunting purposes, which helps to explain this support for 2A rights.

Also look how far the politically connected go to avoid taking cash from the "wrong donors" (e.g.: NRA contributing to a anti-gun activist).

Acting as if using the term "Gun" is a negative because of it relation to violence does a disservice to any and all anti anti-gun movements.

I couldn't find a nice graph, but googling gave me these two years (that I did not cherry pick): here's an anti-gun site giving the numbers for 1998 as 30K [2] and another anti-gun "just the facts" editorial in 2013 saying it's 31K.

There are pro-gun that spout silly things like, "We need to arm every teacher!" and there are anti-gun people that say things like, "We should go door to door and confiscate every gun by force!" "When you start policing their tactics I will take you seriously, until then I support anything that defeats them." How am I supposed to 'police' anyone's tactics?