analgesic

Then, over time, you analgesic grows to soothe more companies' pains. Then you find you captured some percentage of the market.

Swearing is a proven analgesic. I can't see taking that away from people; it would leave people angrier and meaner than they would be without a "what an asshole" after a call with an annoying person.

If they were just using it as an analgesic, which the article clearly indicated is not the case, it would be a different story.

Marijuana is an analgesic. But in this case the effects are stemming from the fact that's its an anti inflammatory, so that the fluid in your disc is no longer compressing the spinal nerves.

It's the same as how the analgesic dose is below the recreational dose of every drug. Which is why you can take opiates for medical purposes without getting addicted as long as you don't abuse them.

Billions of dollars are wasted to fight against a analgesic and therapeutic drug that could help millions; this world haves very dumb and/or corrupted people in charge.

What about acetylsalicylic acid as analgesic, and list goes on. Margarines were really popular at one time, and adverticed as healtyh option to butter.

Our maybe a pill, like some analgesic, freezing your auditory nerves for a while. I have noticed that loud speaking is much less disturbing if you don't understand the language, maybe a drug messing your language brain could help, but if the purpose is to think about something else it will not help...

But in this case back pain is largely caused by anxiety and inflammation, and marijuana is an anxiolytic and an anti-inflammatory, in addition to being an analgesic. So yeah, it kind of makes sense that weed would help with back pain, as it has been shown to many times over.

Cannabis is a recreational drug and is also an effective analgesic, helps in the treatment of glaucoma, and relieves nausea. That something can be used recreationally is irrelevant to its medical utility.

But Aspirin gas proven itself over the years extremely successfully as an anti-pyretic, analgesic, anticoagulant. That's not common among drugs.

Well it's an analgesic, euphoric, prosocial, psychedelic, stimulating, sedating, relatively non-addictive plant that will grow in most parts of the world, may actually be healthier for you than not using it, and to top it off has been a cornerstone of youth culture for fifty-odd years. One's mileage may vary, but it is hard for one not to see the appeal.

Both Ibuprofene and Diclofenac have better analgesic properties, again very noticeable, and metamizole has different properties, again much more useful than asparin. There's really nothing to argue with that, except some hand-waving "placebo" talk, which often isn't so scientific either.

Salicylic acid is a metabolite of aspirin anyway, and is also antipyretic, analgesic, anti-imflammatory. A lower-purity batch of aspirin probably won't be dangerous to use.

That's why medical marijuana is so much better for back problems, because it's a strong anti-inflammatory, and also because the analgesic dose is much lower than the psychoactive dose so you can get relief from your pain without being left unable to function. Especially since you can now get high-CBD marijuana, which is basically non-psychoactive to begin with, but with even stronger anti-inflammatory properties than regular marijuana.

I was trying to explain it without using terms like bioavailability and analgesic potential... I assume that anybody who understands those words doesn't need me to point out my main point, which was simply that it's hard to make a argument based on biochemistry and pharmacokinetics alone for the current drug schedules!

Under "zero tolerance weapons policies", or for having mundane analgesic for menstrual pain under "zero tolerance drug policies", or for wearing a religious-themed T-shirt under "zero tolerance hate speech policies", etc. is not equal reprimand for violations, it's arbitrary abuse born of sociopolitical bigotry doled out by people suffering a tenuous grasp on reality - demonstrating exactly why they should not be empowered as in loco parentis.

Under "zero tolerance weapons policies", or for having mundane analgesic for menstrual human resoures pain under "zero tolerance drug policies", or for wearing a religious-themed T-shirt under "zero tolerance hate speech policies", etc. is not equal reprimand for Employee Relations violations, it's arbitrary abuse born of sociopolitical bigotry doled out by people suffering a tenuous grasp on reality - demonstrating exactly why they should not be empowered as in loco parentis.

Under "zero tolerance weapons policies", or for having mundane analgesic for menstrual human resources pain under "zero tolerance drug policies", or for wearing a religious-themed T-shirt under "zero tolerance hate speech policies", etc. is not equal reprimand for Employee Relations violations, it's arbitrary abuse born of sociopolitical bigotry doled out by people suffering a tenuous grasp on reality - demonstrating exactly why they should not be empowered as in loco parentis.