saami

No one is arguing that Saami are indigenous to Oslo, but they were first in 80% of Scandinavia.

The Inuit and Saami have lived on those diets for so long they became genetically adapted to them.

Also made some of the Saami dialects written languages, and brought temperance - both hugely positive for cultural survival.

There were raids done against Saami as well, though it is right - more profitable raids were better down south.

And the more people came to live where Saami were herding their reindeers, the less space they had left to herd them.

I know it is true for me because I have Saami heritage and the diet cures my hyperlipidemia.

As far as I know, the Saami today are no longer being forcibly assimilated or otherwise genocided.

I agree with you on the Saami diet, I was generalizing for the Sake of brevity in the comments.

And Nordics encroached on lands where even partly Uralized Saami were first.

The Saami live like this, with some berries for vit c.

I would expect the Finnish establishment to have been wary about christianization of the Saami because the missionary Laestadius, in evangelizing the Saami, also inspired them to rise up and assert their rights.

What you are refering to might be in regards to Uralification, while 50% of Saami undeniably have been indigenous population and were there before Uralics arrived there.

And for those who say “you don’t have to eat the animal to get the health benefits”, please tell that to any Inuit or Saami people.

Your previous comment: > And for those who say “you don’t have to eat the animal to get the health benefits”, please tell that to any Inuit or Saami people.

Saami were sparsely populating large areas - so they did not exactly live side by side with other people.

Is there anything related to how the First Nations are treated that the Finns should apply to the Saami?

Are you talking about Icelandic, Saami, or Faroese?