zoophilia

Why should pedophilia, or zoophilia, or any other the other niche sexual attractions be treated differently?

Wikipedia estimates zoophilia has a 2% incidence [4], which would equate to 1.6 million zoophiles in Germany, making the 100k a conservative estimate.

That is totally out of context and has nothing to do with zoophilia.

One of them is definitely not too worried, their pseudonym is also registered on a bestiality/zoophilia forum as well as some overclocking forums.

The only reason Linus Tech Tips isn't serving ads for the virtues of combining zoophilia and narcotics is there isn't much money in it.

I know nothing about allegations of zoophilia, and of course any such extreme allegation without similarly hefty evidence are just ridiculous.

Pedophilia and zoophilia do harm others who don't have a voice, hence the clear divide between those two and a type of legal relationship between consenting adults.

Why do we discriminate against corpses (necrophiliacs) or even different species (zoophilia)?

And they wouldn't be selling zoophilia/lolicon/incest pornography.

Unless they combine zoophilia with pedophilia...

Incest rape simulators, zoophilia, lolicon?

(Which also, by the way, makes pedo-marriages illegal as marriage is a contract.) The zoophilia thing is kind of a red herring for its sheer bizarreness.

When RMS is advocating for zoophilia and necrophilia (he's finally relented on pedophilia, though, after many years of also defending "consensual" pedophilia), it hurts the advocacy for his other causes.

(I won't name the recent manifestations of the late stage liberal freak show.) Human nature is what allows us to determine whether a desire is disordered or not such a pica, pedophilia, or zoophilia, though as the full consequences of liberalism manifest, I would not be surprised if these will eventually be "discredited" as bigoted, narrow-minded, and hateful cultural and social constructions.